The Neal Larson Show

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they delve into the complex aftermath of recent political developments, reflecting on the need for moments of peace amid the constant whirlwind of public discourse. Neal begins by drawing a parallel to Grover Cleveland’s non-consecutive presidencies, likening it to Donald Trump’s unique political journey, which has redefined modern American politics. Neal describes how Trump’s stance on issues like foreign aid and domestic reform has stirred significant political shifts, especially regarding bipartisan disagreements on fiscal policies and the closed primary system.Julie and Neal also address post-election sentiments, sharing insights into Republican Party dynamics, with some members rethinking the party's future while others question long-held alliances. They discuss Idaho's increasingly conservative legislative landscape, noting how the GOP's influence continues to expand, with a majority control over the state legislature. Neal touches on Biden's current presidency, speculating about the legacy he may wish to leave and the actions he might take as his term concludes.Throughout the conversation, Neal and Julie engage listeners, encouraging them to share their thoughts as they navigate these pivotal times in American politics.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they dive into the monumental news that Donald Trump has become the 47th President of the United States. Neal shares how surreal it felt watching the results roll in, surrounded by like-minded individuals as Trump secured victory. The election night was filled with moments of gratitude and intense emotion, and Neal admits he was moved by the experience.They discuss the significance of Trump’s coalition, including support from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr., and Vivek Ramaswamy, which reflects a unique alliance across the political spectrum. Neal and Julie also touch on the success of various ballot initiatives, notably those enforcing citizenship requirements for voting. Arizona’s unique choices regarding election rules and the movement in Alaska to repeal ranked-choice voting also feature in their discussion.The two express cautious optimism about what lies ahead, with Julie noting that the defeat of ranked-choice voting prevents lawmakers from spending time undoing it later. Both hosts appreciate their listeners’ role in getting the word out on issues like Proposition One, and they celebrate the integrity shown by voters in making informed decisions. Reflecting on a range of perspectives, they consider the reshaping of the political landscape and the future for both parties as Trump prepares to take office.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, the hosts delve into Idaho's election concerns, expressing strong confidence in the integrity of the state’s voting system. Neal shares his belief that, unlike other states, Idaho works diligently to ensure every legitimate vote is counted. He criticizes certain Democratic policies that he feels hinder efforts to clean voter rolls of deceased or ineligible voters, asserting these policies allow for potential misuse of votes.As the episode unfolds, Neal and Julie explore the significance of Proposition One, which they argue would lead to a problematic overhaul of Idaho's election system. They voice concerns that if Proposition One passes, it could deeply impact Idaho’s values of secure, fair voting. In advocating for vigilance, Neal calls on conservatives to “demoralize” progressive efforts he views as detrimental, emphasizing the importance of protecting one-person-one-vote principles.Throughout the episode, callers share their perspectives on Trump, local propositions, and the importance of voting. Neal encourages listeners to participate in the election process, particularly those concerned with upholding Idaho’s conservative values. The hosts emphasize the importance of reading ballot measures closely and understanding how each vote influences Idaho’s future. Neal expresses optimism about Trump’s prospects but encourages conservative unity in safeguarding Idaho’s political integrity.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, the focus is on the integrity of the upcoming election and Idaho's proactive measures to secure voting processes. Neal and Julie express concerns over how some Democrat-led swing states may handle vote counting, particularly in states where voter rolls might still include deceased individuals. They discuss the importance of transparency, especially in high-stakes areas, and the need for accountability as poll watchers observe voting processes.Secretary of State Phil McGrane joins to share insights on Idaho's election readiness. With early voting turnout already high, McGrane highlights the robust procedures Idaho has implemented, including same-day registration, secure absentee ballot handling, and early voting security. He reassures listeners that Idaho’s election infrastructure is well-prepared to handle both local and national challenges.They also touch on Proposition 1, urging Idahoans to vote conscientiously on issues that could impact the state's future. For Idaho, they emphasize, the focus should remain on fair and transparent voting. Neal and Julie encourage everyone, regardless of political stance, to exercise their right to vote on Election Day.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they dive into a whirlwind of current political topics, starting with recent controversies over remarks by Joe Biden and Mark Cuban, which have stirred tensions among Trump supporters. Neal and Julie discuss how Biden’s recent comments labeling some Americans as “garbage” and Cuban’s criticism of Trump supporters have sparked significant backlash, questioning whether these statements could have unintended consequences in Trump’s favor.As the conversation unfolds, they explore Trump’s continued popularity, particularly with groups that have traditionally been challenging for him to secure, such as young voters and women. Neal and Julie also touch on Trump’s high-profile interview with Joe Rogan, which they argue has played a significant role in bolstering his reach. This momentum, combined with increased traction among first-time or lapsed voters, makes them optimistic about Trump’s potential performance in upcoming elections, despite divisive issues.The discussion then pivots to Idaho’s Prop 1 and the implications of out-of-state money and ranked-choice voting, which Neal and Julie warn could dilute voters' influence and create unintended complexities in election outcomes. They explain ranked-choice voting’s impact on election dynamics, where the removal of lower-ranked candidates might result in votes shifting to candidates that some voters may not fully support. They share how these changes might force people into ranking candidates they oppose to avoid their votes being exhausted—a point many listeners struggle with.To round things out, Neal and Julie emphasize a call for states to retain more autonomy over federal decisions. This reflects a larger trend they see toward empowering local voices and diminishing federal overreach. The hosts field listener reactions, noting the difficulties of engaging in civil discourse over such polarizing issues but appreciating the support and curiosity of their audience, especially around these complex topics.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they dive into the hot-button issues of the current political landscape, beginning with a discussion of how candidates are navigating the public’s perception, especially when handling divisive topics. Neal expresses that Donald Trump’s recent focus on policy has made a strong impression, particularly among voters who are still on the fence. They discuss the impact of voting propositions like ranked-choice voting and open primaries, with Neal noting how these could shift Idaho’s traditional political structure. Julie adds her perspective on how some view these voting systems as a push for more moderate or even liberal candidates in conservative states.The discussion takes a closer look at the group “Veterans for Idaho Voters” and the argument over closed primaries in Idaho. Neal voices concerns that allowing open primaries could disrupt conservative outcomes by inviting non-Republicans to participate. They also touch on the emotional responses these issues evoke, particularly around ranked-choice voting, dark money in politics, and the broader implications for state autonomy.Finally, both hosts emphasize the importance of voters understanding the long-term impacts of these proposed changes and encourage listeners to consider whether these modifications align with their vision for Idaho’s future.

Send us a textBarb Ehardt invites listeners to join the "Trump Train" event. Not only is Idaho’s current infrastructure not be prepared to implement RCV, but it would open the door for unconventional election outcomes, such as helping a lone Democrat in a race against several Republicans.Julie adds that the surge of outside funding for Prop 1 could undermine Idaho's local autonomy, emphasizing the need for transparency about who’s backing this shift. They both question whether ranked-choice voting would benefit the state, with concerns that it may complicate Idaho’s historically straightforward election process. The conversation also touches on the handling of mail-in ballots, and the issues surrounding post-election counting.Neal and Julie wrap up by encouraging listeners to explore the full documentary on Prop 1 by texting a provided number and stay informed ahead of the November election, urging Idahoans to be cautious and deliberate with their votes.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they discuss the current political climate, focusing on the momentum Donald Trump seems to be gaining in the upcoming election. Neal comments on the surge of energy he senses in Trump’s campaign but emphasizes that supporters shouldn’t become complacent; he urges voters to turn out in full force on Election Day. They touch on Proposition One in Idaho and the controversies surrounding ranked-choice voting, including out-of-state funding and the risks they feel it presents to local elections. Wendy Harmon joins the discussion, sharing her efforts to mobilize support despite recent challenges, highlighting the importance of local involvement in Idaho's elections.Neal and Julie also analyze Trump’s recent events and statements, as well as broader reactions to his policies on immigration, inflation, and crime. They note how Trump’s approach to direct conversations, particularly through platforms like podcasts, resonates with many voters, differing from traditional media coverage. They conclude with a plug for upcoming "Trump Trains" in Idaho, encouraging listeners to participate and show support. Neal sees this as a turning point, noting how these movements reflect the current pulse among Trump supporters in the lead-up to the election.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they dive deep into the complex world of ranked choice voting and the implications of Proposition One, a topic stirring considerable debate. Neal opens up about his initial concerns over Prop One, noting the financial pressures it may impose and how opinions could sway based on available information, especially in close races. They discuss the impact of ranked choice voting, drawing insights from Speaker Tilton from Alaska, who shares Alaska's experience with the system. She recounts how ranked choice voting, despite efforts to educate the public, has led to some voter confusion and, at times, lower participation. Speaker Tilton also explains the substantial financial backing the system received in Alaska, funded by significant outside contributions, which she argues contrasts with the goal of reducing "dark money" in politics.Neal and Julie explore the risks and confusion voters may face in a ranked choice setup and debate whether it truly serves the democratic process. They highlight instances where voters may end up unintentionally marking ballots incorrectly or casting votes for candidates they didn’t intend to support. Neal expresses skepticism, suggesting that ranked choice voting could obscure the will of the people, giving those who control the count too much influence over outcomes. As the discussion closes, Neal and Julie encourage listeners to think critically about ranked choice voting, its potential to reshape elections, and the importance of understanding the system's implications before casting a vote.

Send us a textBONUS EXCLUSIVE: Neal and Julie laugh over the latest Babylon Bee Headlines.STUDIO 4 COVERS: Abby Freeman sings from Disney's The Little Mermaid.Neal & Julie take calls from listeners about Prop One and RCV. Preparation begins for Neal & Julie's big election night watch party.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they delve into the complex topic of ranked choice voting (RCV), focusing on its potential impact on elections. Neal discusses a viral social media post that uses a food analogy to explain the process, but he quickly shifts the conversation to the fundamental flaws he sees in RCV. He argues that traditional voting methods, such as the boarda method, more accurately reflect voter preferences without distorting the results.Julie adds that the goal of RCV proponents, particularly in the context of Prop 1, is to sway elections in favor of liberal candidates who might not succeed in a binary system. Neal expresses concern that RCV complicates the process unnecessarily, making it harder for voters to understand and making it more difficult for candidates to clearly distinguish themselves. Julie then compares the system to professional sports teams, noting how it would be absurd for fans of one team to select players for their rivals—a metaphor illustrating how RCV takes control away from voters.They discuss the importance of giving candidates a period to campaign against a single opponent, which RCV undermines by forcing voters to juggle multiple choices. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of RCV for both local and national elections, including the possibility of civil unrest depending on the outcomes. Neal emphasizes the need for traditional voting methods to avoid such complications and to ensure the electorate’s voice is truly heard.Finally, Neal and Julie urge listeners to remain engaged, suggesting that getting people out to vote on Election Day is far more powerful than simply placing a sign in your yard.

Send us a textNeal & Julie interview Idaho's Secretary of State Phil McGrane about the upcoming election, with several questions about Prop One. Interview begins at 23:54Other topics: Kamala Harris, Donald Trump.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, Neal shares the behind-the-scenes effort he has poured into creating a documentary on Proposition One and ranked choice voting. He explains how what began as a small project turned into a deeply researched film, aimed at shedding light on the complexities and potential risks of ranked choice voting in Idaho. Julie highlights the importance of talking to friends and neighbors about this issue, underscoring the need to spread awareness. They also touch on the broader political landscape, with Neal critiquing figures like Kamala Harris and discussing the potential outcomes of the 2024 election. Julie adds her perspective on the current climate, emphasizing the significance of staying informed and engaged. Throughout the show, they maintain a tone of urgency, reflecting the critical nature of both the ranked choice voting discussion and the national political environment.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, the discussion dives into the complexities surrounding ranked choice voting. Neal reflects on how this issue has been weighing on him, highlighting the concerns many conservatives have about the potential impact on elections. Julie shares a personal anecdote, suggesting that voters are being swayed by misleading campaigns, and both hosts express frustration with how ranked choice voting can split the Republican vote, leaving many feeling disenfranchised.They also discuss how celebrity endorsements, like Usher's appearance at a Kamala Harris rally, are being used to rally support but may not have the intended effect on voters. Neal and Julie explore how the left often resorts to these tactics to sway the electorate but question whether they truly resonate with the general public.Throughout the episode, they tackle the broader political landscape, including the importance of voting as people of faith and how misinformation is shaping younger generations’ views. Neal emphasizes the need for more open dialogue about ranked choice voting, and they both agree that educating the public on these changes is crucial.

Send us a textIn a spirited interview, Neal and Julie press Proposition One proponent Hyrum Erickson over several issues connected to the Open Primaries/Ranked Choice Voting initiative.

Send us a textOn this episode with Neal and Julie, they kick off by discussing how they're just two and a half weeks away from the election, and there's a lot happening. They share a story about giving out political signs, which started as a simple plan but quickly escalated into an overwhelming response from people eager to get their hands on the signs. They even joke about how it felt like a scene from "The Walking Dead" with people coming from all directions.Neal then dives into the significance of Prop 1, explaining how it could fundamentally change Idaho's election system. He passionately warns listeners about the dangers of this proposition, arguing that the messaging around it has been misleading and underplays the gravity of the changes it could bring. He emphasizes how much is at stake for Idaho’s future if the proposition passes, calling it a direct threat to their way of life and freedoms.Meanwhile, Julie chimes in with her own frustrations about the election season, noting how it's starting to wear on her patience. They also give a shoutout to a local band, Jay and I, who join them in the studio to perform a cover of "Millionaire" by Chris Stapleton. The episode balances political urgency with moments of lighthearted music and camaraderie.

Send us a textOn this episode of the Neal Larson Show, Neal and Julie dive into a variety of hot-button political issues, focusing on Kamala Harris' recent interview with Brett Baier on Fox News. They both feel the interview was disastrous for Harris, but anticipate that media outlets will attempt to downplay its impact. Neal also criticizes the lack of transparency surrounding ranked choice voting in Idaho's Proposition 1. He argues that its proponents, like Reclaim Idaho, are pushing for open primaries while hiding the ranked choice voting component, which he believes will lead to unfavorable electoral outcomes similar to those seen in Alaska.Julie chimes in with her own skepticism about ranked choice voting, describing how it's often presented as a secondary feature to open primaries and how many voters are unaware of its full implications. They discuss how this system can lead to unexpected results, as it did in past elections, and express concerns about the confusion it may cause among Idaho voters. The show touches on the broader national landscape, with some reflections on how issues like ranked choice voting and Kamala Harris' performance affect voters’ decisions.Callers also share their opinions, with some worried about how these dynamics could play out at the ballot box.

Send us a text On this episode of the Neal Larson Show, Neal and Julie tackled the controversial topic of ranked choice voting and open primaries. Neal expressed his frustration, especially when he mentioned that ranked choice voting is confusing, only for it to be downplayed. Both hosts questioned why proponents of these changes heavily emphasize open primaries while avoiding deeper discussions about ranked choice voting, suggesting it might be because it’s more complex than they want voters to realize.

Send us a textOn this episode of the Neal Larson Show, Neal and Julie discuss Idaho's Proposition One, voicing strong concerns about its potential impact on the state's election process. They argue that the proposition’s supporters are using misleading tactics to sell the idea, emphasizing that if passed, it could strip political parties of their ability to nominate candidates and allow candidates to falsely claim any party affiliation on the ballot. Neal and Julie stress that this change could significantly alter the integrity of Idaho’s elections, urging listeners to engage with their communities and spread the word.The duo also touches on the broader political landscape, diving into the latest polling data that shows Donald Trump leading in several key swing states. They reflect on how polling often underestimates Trump’s performance and question the media's portrayal of the 2024 presidential race. Additionally, Neal and Julie share their frustrations with how the media covers political controversies, such as Kamala Harris's plagiarism scandal and selective reporting on issues like immigration and election integrity.As the show progresses, Neal and Julie encourage Idaho voters to stay informed and active, especially with only three weeks until the election. They also announce plans for a rally and sign distribution to encourage a "No" vote on Proposition One, calling for citizens to advocate for the truth and protect Idaho’s election system.

Send us a textOn this episode of the Neal Larson Podcast, Neal and Julie dive into the complexities of ranked choice voting and its potential effects in Idaho. They emphasize how critical it is for voters to understand that if they don't rank multiple choices, their ballot may become "exhausted" after the first round, leaving them without a voice in subsequent rounds. Neal and Julie discuss the potential for vote splitting among Republicans, which could open the door for less popular candidates to succeed, drawing on examples from Alaska's experience with ranked choice voting.They also touch on the growing willingness of Idaho voters to openly support Donald Trump, as the political pendulum shifts. Neal and Julie express their excitement about the upcoming election season, sharing plans to engage listeners with live interactions and hand the mic to national media when needed. Wrapping up the episode, they express concerns about how ranked choice voting could disrupt traditional party systems and add complexity to the voting process.