Drilled

Critical Frequency

A true-crime podcast about climate change. Hosted by award-winning investigative journalist Amy Westervelt and reported by a team of climate journalists, Drilled investigates the various obstacles that have kept the world from adequately responding to climate change. read less

Our Editor's Take

When most true crime podcasts begin, the victim has already met their demise. The victim is in trouble in the Drilled podcast, but there's still time to save them. The victim is Mother Earth, and the villain is the fossil fuel industry. Anyone concerned about the future may want to listen to this award-winning podcast.

Amy Westervelt is the investigative journalist who hosts Drilled, a climate-change-focused podcast. The New York Times and The Guardian are among the publications that have printed her work. Much of her efforts focus on climate and justice. She also worked with Indigenous activist Rebecca Nagle on the podcast This Land. Podcast episodes alternate between sound bites and Westervelt's measured and confident narration. Many people contribute to this important narrative. The sound bites come from people who have information or an impact on the story. Some are journalists. Others are people who once worked for the oil companies the podcast examines.

The first episode of the Drilled podcast investigates the origins of climate denial. The story began in the late '70s. Scientists warned Exxon about the potential impacts of their corporate plan. Exxon believed the scientists. At that time, everyone seemed to agree about ecological concerns. Scientists, fossil fuel companies, and politicians all seemed willing to talk. So what happened?

There were disinformation campaigns in the '90s. Religious groups played a role, as did the First Amendment. Then West Coast fishermen could not fish because the water was getting too warm. There were lawsuits and fake news. Then there was misinformation. Each Drilled episode explores a part of history that led to the current concerns. Other topics include greenwashing and the culture war. The podcast features new episodes each week.

read less
ScienceScience

Season 10

Seven Years Later, an Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline
Dec 7 2023
Seven Years Later, an Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline
This month, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers closes the comment period on its draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline, a 1,172-mile pipeline that’s been pumping 500,000 barrels of oil per day since May 2017. The pipeline runs from the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota to southern Illinois, crossing the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. Over the past six years, every court in the country has ruled that the Army Corps of Engineers did not study the pipeline’s environmental impact closely enough before approving the pipeline’s route. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has maintained all along that the project poses a serious threat to its drinking water. From April 2016 to February 2017 thousands of water protectors from all over the country (and beyond) joined them in protests and direct actions. The resistance at Standing Rock is often cited by the fossil fuel industry, police and politicians as the reason states need new anti-protest laws, while the backlash to that resistance is often cited by water protectors as the reason for PTSD, asthma, and in some cases lost eyes and limbs. Now, the Army Corps of Engineers says that removing the pipeline would be too damaging to the Missouri River and its surrounding ecosystems. The removal actions it describes in its EIS are the same actions taken to install the pipeline in the first place. The Army Corps suggests that removing the pipeline would be more environmentally harmful than allowing the oil to continue pumping under one of Standing Rock's primary drinking water sources. Nonetheless, this report—seven years late—represents one of the few pathways left to stop the pipeline. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe is advocating to seal the pipeline off, while some water protectors are advocating for the pipeline to be removed entirely. The public comment period closes Dec 13, 2023. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices