On The Natural State Of Nature

What starts off as a discussion into when String Theory "jumped the shark" then breaks off into an array of topics including a far better answer to the cause of our big bang and even the nature of quantum weirdness.    String theory should have stopped with the math of the standard model of particle physics and not tried to "loop" in gravity.     But math is not reality.  Everything that we can see or feel or measure can be described with math but not everything that math can describe is necessarily going to exist in reality.   Things like wormholes, whiteholes, loop quantum gravity (or any quantum gravity) , and singularities may only exist on paper and in formula and never actually manifest in the realm of the physical.  Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

String theory has some odd ideas about what dimensions are and lots of people use the word wrong all the time. Once you understand the true nature of dimensions you can begin to see that the conformal cycle happens much differently than Penrose first represented.   I say time is the first dimension followed by 3 spatial dimensions and to truly exist, every 4D object must intersect with the plane of massenergy to become a 6D object.   Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

It is my proposition that you can not prove the Universe (the one with a capital U) is finite.  No experiment could ever be done to unequivocally prove the Universe is finite.   But multiple pieces of observational evidence can help point to the fact that our visible universe (the one with the lower case u)  is not The Universe  !  And there are specific observations I feel that can prove beyond a doubt that our Universe must be infinite and eternal.  Proof that all we can ever see is nothing but a point in time and point in space because the true natural state of nature is that there is an infinite number of separate points in spacetime and every one of those points is relative to some finite number of other points in spacetime.  What is happening at each point , be it mass , or energy, or motion , or force, or heat, or light , or sound, still boils down to relative waves of energy. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

When we examine all logical potential explanations for the nature of existence only one answer can be truly said to be paradox free and inconsistency free. It seems almost counter intuitive sometimes but inside the bigger picture it becomes clear as the only possible set of answers that together help explain the true natural state of nature.Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

We pretend we don't know what is inside the event horizon of a black hole when all the physics really only points to one specific likely possibility.  One thing we can most definitely rule out is any type of singularity, they exist on paper and in formula only and do not in fact exist in the physical realm.  Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

So if there was ever going to be an actual TOE, theory of everything what would it really need to include?By its definition it would need to explain what single force is the driving force behind all other forces as well as I think the single building block of everything that is, was, or will ever be.It would need to explain wave particle duality, the collapsing wave function, superposition, quantum tunneling, and if possible, maybe even "spooky action at a distance" but I will admit, at face value that last one could be tricky.It would need to explain the catalyst that caused the chain of cosmic events we have labeled our Big Bang, it would need to explain what came before it, and what will eventually become of our universe. It would have to provide a clear picture of the true nature of not only time and space but also mass and energy. It would need to be able to explain how mass and energy can bend and warp both space and time. I also think it would need to explain both dark matter and dark energy and thus fill in the gaps in our true understanding of gravity and why the rate that our visible universe is expanding appears to be increasing. It should be able to provide a likely reason why gravity can warp both space and time and how gravity works at both the micro and macro scales.It should be able to explain how life first forms on dead wet rocks and how the potential course of human evolution should be expected to proceed. In doing so if it can better explain how and why humans evolved into the dominant species on our planet then all the better.Well I believe I have come across such a theory.  Cheers,Live Long And Prosper,May The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok#thenaturalstateofnature#successivecollisiontheoryhttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

There is no crisis in cosmology because the one we see now is self imposed and self created.  We created it by adding assumptions on top of assumptions instead of working with a logical premise.  We assumed a period of inflation that did not happen and we assume that vacuum energy causes the expansion of the universe and assume something called dark energy exists.  Instead what we have is the effect of what we see and call dark energy , the Hubble constant , the Hubble flow, and the expansion of the universe all caused by a very simple and well understood theory in physics but completely overlooked because nobody wants to stand up and shout THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES ! Well the time has come to declare the Lambda-CDM model dead because a new theory in town explains away all the mysteries surrounding all the assumptions we made, band-aid after band-aid to come up with an idea of  a hot dense quantum fluctuating space time of cold dark matter creating all we can see from within the original size of a golf ball. #successivecollisiontheory offers a far better understanding of what came before the big bang and what caused the big bang and when we begin to unravel the true nature of space and time we see a clear reason why we would predict a variable rate of expansion that will be shown to increase exponentially over time.   We already see the first truth that the rate of expansion varies across our visible universe and we will soon see that rate is in fact increasing exponentially in those areas inside our visible universe where our internal overlapping gravity wells are fighting a loosing battle. I always suggesting starting this podcast series from the beginning to get a better picture but this one episode does a pretty good job of summing things up. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

When we examine all the overlapping gravity wells of localized pockets of spacetime we see a tensor mesh of gravitational attraction form and that mesh is what fights off its parent frame of reference's tensor mesh.  The endless battle between a succession of gravitational tensor meshes of successive parent frames of reference in constant battle with our own is why we predict a variable Hubble constant that will increase exponentially over time.  This will someday be proven beyond a doubt and further validate #thenaturalstateofnature and #successivecollisiontheory .No orbit contains infinite energy and all orbits eventually decay. Some inwards but eventually outwards. We see our moon slowly move away from our planet and our planet and all the planets slowly moving away from our home star.  Our home star, Sol, slowing moving away like most other stars in our galaxy from Sagittarius A*.    Sagittarius A* slowly ( or not so slowly) moving away from the center of its orbit, The Great Attractor.  And The Great Attractor slowly moving away from the center of its orbit, The Sloane Attractor.  A nested succession of parent frames of reference where every parent frame of reference feeds all its children with a base perception of both space and time. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

When we examine the true nature of spacetime we begin to see that Cartesian coordinates are inadequate to properly explore reality.  Instead polar coordinate mapping or spherical coordinate mapping offer a far better perspective to visualizing the true natural state of nature.  That is due to the way that every pocket of spacetime interacts with and is visible to every other pocket of spacetime. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

It is a mistake to claim we can never understand what came before the big bang or what caused the big bang.  We just need to step back and re-examine the assumptions made in our current model and then review a more likely assumption to the formation of our visible universe than a hot dense quantum fluctuating golf ball of cold dark matter.  When we do so we begin to understand dark energy very clearly as well as many of the other mysteries plaguing our current paradigms.  It all boils down to understanding the nature of time and space itself.  When we apply what both general relativity and special relativity are telling us than that very nature of time and space itself become abundantly clear and then so many of the mysteries of science all begin to unravel at our feet. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #TheNaturalStateOfNaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

We create our own silly paradoxes by clinging to the last shreds of our Earthcentricity.  That feeling that our planet or species is in some way special.  We gain comfort in claiming we know what the smallest most elemental units of anything are when in reality that knowledge will forever remain within the confines of the limitations of the scientific precision of the best instruments used to record those observations.   We can have a packetized and quantized description of reality relative the laws of physics behaving within a range of scale factors but can not say with certainty we know something is in fact elemental and beyond division. When instead we examine what it would mean if there were a realm of mass and energy far far smaller than the electron neutrino we come across some very interesting predictions.  It would predict that waves of energy in motion, the same waves we see manifest through the quantum fields that make QFT so successful would be seen as an aggregation of waves in phase from a subquantum source.   If there was a subquantum realm we would see those random aggregations of waves constantly breaking through the quantum barriers but only those of sufficient strength could become stable so we would predict measurable vacuum energy as well as a need for both virtual particles and renormalization to make Feynman diagrams work effectively.  But the evidence does not stop there. If it were true then we would predict those aggregations of waves of subquantum energy in phase (manifesting through quantum fields) would aggregate with a combined energy and velocity and trajectory and like all waves would do its best to try to spread out in all three spatial dimensions for as long as each medium allows. It is that aggregation of subquantum energy we call decoherence or the collapse of the wave function but a subquantum realm would predict its occurrent as a spacetime event would be probabilistic.   A sub quantum realm where aggregations of waves of energy in phase not yet sufficient in strength to break the quantum barrier are still able to interact in both repulsive and attractive ways.   Those attractive and repulsive events would cause the manifestation of the aggregation of those waves through a quantum field to occur at not exactly random places , but often deviating from its predicted path. The fact we have a probabilistic wave function, vacuum energy, virtual particles, renormalization, might be enough to prove it but there is one more undeniable fact.  There is a fact we can not escape that confirms a subquantum realm if certain. If our spacetime was not comprised of massenergy we could not directly measure it would have zero reason to be attracted to massenergy.  The ONLY Way you get spacetime being attracted to massenergy is if it is made up of smaller massenergy.   It is the fact we can see gravity warp spacetime that proves there much be a subquantum realm we can not see.  I would guess likely about a trillion times smaller in mass and charge than the electron neutrino and in abundance far more prevalent than the current number of neutrinos we see.  A mind boggling number of them, subquantum waves of energy that if we tried to measure a certain scale factor we end up giving something new a name.  I predict that all this evidence alone may not be sufficient because its all circumstantial. Its unfortunately the that limitations in our ability to perceive a subquantum realm could be limited by the laws of physics themself and beyond any possible measurement.  It becomes something we do on science when enough evidence matches prediction that we  see patterns develop to help make sense of it all.    Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org Shed your last shred of earthcentricity by accepting our visible universe is but a speck of cosmic dust floating inside a vast an eternal and infinite flowing sea of cosmic dust.  A point in time and a point in space.

There is a very sharp divide across our species.  There is one portion (and I don't think that it is even close to half ) who firmly understand the most paradox free method of explaining existence is an #eternally #infinite #multiverse and a second portion who firmly believe existence can be either finite in time or finite in space or both.  There is no in between.  There may be some who claim to take an agnostic approach to the topic but most would still fall into one of those two divisions even if they don't realize it yet themselves. Which portion do you fall into ?  When we really take a moment to try to interpret what general relativity and special relativity are trying to tell us it becomes clear that all we can know of our existence is our relative time and our relative space.  Infinitesimal cross sections of a much larger succession of parent frames of reference.  Our entire visible universe nothing but a point in time and a point in space.  Forged across a discrete span of relative space across a discrete span of relative time thanks to the intersecting paths of two much much larger parent frames of references far far removed from the parent frame of reference our visible universe is most Absolutely hurling through right now.   Our visible universe almost certainly has siblings all sharing the same relative trajectory and relative velocity playing follow the leader(s) as part of an infinite succession of nested pockets of spacetime across an infinite number of separate nested pockets of relative pressurized spacetime massenergy heatradiation.  We may be in orbit and have an orbital period no different than how Sagitarius A* has an orbital period around the Great Attractor which itself is in orbit around the Shapley Attractor.  We likely have an approximate axis of rotation and rate of rotation as we revolve around our denser sibling(s). Or is our universe the dense parent dragging all its children along on its journey just as the sun drags us and we drag the moon?.  That is almost certainly a question we may never be able to actually confirm!!  But please my friends do not mistake that for meaning that its unknowable nature means its not really happening!  Embrace at the very core of every standard model the premise, not speculation of eternal time and infinite space and build from there and watch nearly all the current mysteries of science literally unravel at out feet. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

Can all forces in the universe really be consolidated to a single underlying force behind them all.  When one understands the true building block of reality than I think yes, there can in fact be a driving force behind everything and when we attack the problem from a new perspective the answers won't far behind. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

What theory of everything would be complete without being able to describe the basic building block that makes up all of existence ?   Can we honestly expect to ever find such an elementary building block?  I think so. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

Far more wave function collapses are driven by the laws of the macro world than the very small number that collapse early due to observation or measurement. So much effort has been put into trying to understand the significance of the wave function collapse / decoherence that it has taken on an almost mystical surrealism.  When we apply the same rigor we allocate to all other experiments as it relates the impacts of the observer effect then we must accept the possibility that the moment the interference pattern disappears, we are no longer watching nature in its natural state.  Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

Measurable vacuum energy and the need for both renormalization and virtual particles to describe the underlying mechanics of the quantum world tells us that we may have been premature to call anything quantized as also being elementary.  Instead when we investigate the clear evidence for a subquantum realm beyond our ability to ever measure it directly we see the real reason why spacetime is able to bend and warp to the will of mass.  If it were not for a subquantum realm at scale factors likely trillions of times smaller than the electron neutrino then spacetime itself would not be impacted by gravity at all. Live Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok #thenaturalstateofnaturehttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

I feel there exists  testable hypotheses for potential real explanations for the true nature of dark matter.  Dark matter is just a placeholder for an incomplete understanding of gravity at cosmic scales.  We will not find dark matter in wimps or machos but will find it when we adjust the general theory of relativity with one or more parameters that helps it more accurately predict the nature of all celestial movements.  I offer some likely answers to what those parameters represent.#thenaturalstateofnatureLive Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipokhttps://thenaturalstateofnature.org

There is a far better explanation for the period prior to recombination than a hot dense fluctuating inflating pea of cold dark matter. A theory that follows perfectly from observations.  One that not only offers up a realistic starting size and temperature but one that can explain current questions like the horizon problem, harmonic quasar inclinations, harmonic galactic inclinations, harmonic galactic periods, super filaments, supervoids, red transients, blue transients, and missing black holes. #successivecollisiontheory#thenaturalstateofnatureLive Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok

There is a far better explanation for the period prior to recombination than a hot dense fluctuating inflating pea of cold dark matter. A theory that follows perfectly from observations.  One that not only offers up a realistic starting size and temperature but one that can explain current questions like the horizon problem, harmonic quasar inclinations, harmonic galactic inclinations, harmonic galactic periods, super filaments, supervoids, red transients, blue transients, and missing black holes. #successivecollisiontheory#thenaturalstateofnatureLive Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok

There is a far better explanation for the period prior to recombination than a hot dense fluctuating inflating pea of cold dark matter. A theory that follows perfectly from observations.  One that not only offers up a realistic starting size and temperature but one that can explain current questions like the horizon problem, harmonic quasar inclinations, harmonic galactic inclinations, harmonic galactic periods, super filaments, supervoids, red transients, blue transients, and missing black holes. #successivecollisiontheory#thenaturalstateofnatureLive Long And ProsperMay The Force Be With You42DR JM Nipok