Journal of Accountancy Podcast

AICPA & CIMA

The Journal of Accountancy podcast discusses the key issues facing the accounting profession. read less
BusinessBusiness
NewsNews
Business NewsBusiness News

Episodes

JofA highlights: Tackling accounting’s talent shortage, ChatGPT tips
Sep 19 2024
JofA highlights: Tackling accounting’s talent shortage, ChatGPT tips
Jeff Drew, the JofA’s editor-in-chief, is the guest on today’s episode, the 400th in the history of the JofA podcast. He’s recapping for listeners some of the top articles of the summer and looking ahead to content in future issues. Drew, a former JofA senior editor and manager with the AICPA's Private Companies Practice Section, has focused on content for the daily and monthly magazines for more than a decade. He reviews or previews coverage on numerous topics, including the retirement of AICPA & CIMA CEO Barry Melancon, CPA, CGMA. Resources September JofA: HTML version | Flipbook Articles (HTML links) How academia is tackling the accounting talent shortage Rewriting accounting’s employment narrative Taxation of influencers: Gifts with strings attached? Using ChatGPT-4o with Excel Using ChatGPT to build a standard operating procedure   Summer feature articles ·         Single-owner firms: The thrill of flying solo ·         What not-for-profits need to know about UBIT ·         How CPAs can benefit from not-for-profit board service ·         Guiding not-for-profits through post-pandemic challenges ·         What to know to avoid deficient not-for-profit audits Technology Q&A ·         How to find errors in Excel formulas ·         How to create a watermark in Excel ·         Identify and delete duplicates in Excel ·         Get more out of Teams with these 5 features ·         4 features for enhancing PDFs ·         Building an HR guide with ChatGPT  Professional Liability Spotlight IRS funding and a potential rise in malpractice claims Issue links: August HTML | Flipbook July HTML | Flipbook June HTML | Flipbook Podcast episodes: Barry Melancon part 1 Barry Melancon part 2 If you have article ideas or other magazine feedback, you can reach Drew at Jeff.Drew@aicpa-cima.com. What you’ll learn from this episode: ·         The “incredible range of backstories” in an article focusing on sole practitioners and sole proprietors. ·         The focus of several recent Technology Q&A articles. ·         Highlights of a summer Professional Liability Spotlight article. ·         The link between Barry Melancon and Muhammad Ali. ·         A preview of the October digital edition of the JofA.
Potential effects of Loper Bright and Corner Post on tax practitioners
Aug 22 2024
Potential effects of Loper Bright and Corner Post on tax practitioners
On this episode of the JofA podcast, Melanie Lauridsen, vice president–Tax Policy & Advocacy for the AICPA, explains some of the tax-related repercussions of recent Supreme Court decisions. One case could have a dramatic effect on future rulemaking, and the other could have a decades-long retroactive effect. On June 28, the Supreme Court overturned its decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), holding that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in determining the meaning of statutory provisions, and courts may not defer to an agency's interpretation of the law just because a statute is ambiguous (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 (6/28/24)). On July 1, the Supreme Court decision expanded the time frame to sue federal agencies, holding that the six-year statute of limitation for lawsuits challenging regulations does not start to run until a plaintiff is injured by final agency action (Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 22-1008 (7/1/24)). What you’ll learn from this episode: ·         Background on the Loper Bright and Corner Post decisions. ·         Why Lauridsen said that one of the rulings was unexpected. ·         Why Sec. 6045 broker regulations could now be “vulnerable.” ·         The reasons that, according to Lauridsen, the Loper Bright decision will not likely affect beneficial ownership information reporting requirements. ·         How legislators on Capitol Hill have reacted to the decisions.
How tax practitioners viewed filing season, plus ERC and BOI updates
Jul 11 2024
How tax practitioners viewed filing season, plus ERC and BOI updates
Melanie Lauridsen, vice president–Tax Policy & Advocacy for the AICPA, joined the Journal of Accountancy podcast earlier this month to discuss the latest developments related to several items of note for tax practitioners. Lauridsen shared data from a survey of members about IRS performance during tax filing season. She also analyzed recent IRS proposed regulations related to interest recapture on excess COVID-19 credits.   In her previous podcast update, Lauridsen focused on IRS data related to its performance during filing season. Lauridsen said that detailed information will be coming soon on the Tax Section Odyssey podcast related to the employee retention credit. What you’ll learn from this episode: ·         Updates related to employee retention credit (ERC) claims. ·         Why ERC claims labeled “medium-risk” by the IRS are on hold. ·         Lauridsen’s analysis of proposed regulations released by the IRS earlier this month. ·         The focus of a Maryland opinion on beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements. ·         The “awareness issue” related to BOI reporting. ·         Why Lauridsen said that the sentiment of tax practitioners is not in alignment with that of the IRS when it comes to IRS performance during filing season. ·         The “safe harbor” that could be offered by a congressional bill. ·         Updates on AICPA advocacy work with several entities.
Analyzing Moore: The ruling that upheld the Sec. 965 transition tax
Jul 2 2024
Analyzing Moore: The ruling that upheld the Sec. 965 transition tax
Tony Nitti, CPA, discusses a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that some observers viewed as having the potential for wide-ranging changes in tax law. In the end, the decision was a narrow one, but the details of what was addressed and what wasn’t make for an interesting conversation on this collaborative podcast episode. Nitti, partner–National Tax at EY, joins April Walker, CPA, CGMA, lead manager–Tax Practice & Ethics at AICPA & CIMA, for this episode, jointly produced by the JofA and the Tax Section Odyssey podcast. On June 20, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Sec. 965 transition tax in a narrow opinion that applies only to passthrough entities (Moore, No. 22-800 (U.S. 6/20/24)). The Court found it was not required to address whether it is a constitutional requirement that income must be realized before it can be taxed. Nitti and Walker discussed the ruling in a late June recording. Resources: n  The unabridged version of the Walker and Nitti conversation on the Tax Section Odyssey page. n  Journal of Accountancy news coverage of the June 20 Supreme Court ruling. n  A November 2023 conversation about the Moore case. What you’ll learn from this episode: ·         Details of the Supreme Court vote and the facts of the Moore case. ·         Why Nitti said that an expected “showdown” didn’t happen. ·         What Nitti observed about the case from its oral arguments in late 2023. ·         How the case could open up further discussion on the taxation of unrealized gains and the constitutionality of a wealth tax. ·         The value, in Nitti’s eyes, of reading the dissenting opinions.