For America

with David Bozell

"Never give the Left a free day."

read less
NewsNews

Episodes

Student loan "forgiveness" gives the proverbial middle finger to blue-collar Americans.
3d ago
Student loan "forgiveness" gives the proverbial middle finger to blue-collar Americans.
TOPIC: David Bozell and Tim Constantine Discuss the Controversy Over Student Loan Forgiveness and Political Protests on College CampusesMONEY LINE: "He has given the proverbial middle finger to the American taxpayer, to every blue collar worker who decided that college was not for them."KEY TAKEAWAYS:Joe Biden's plan for student loan forgiveness is a taxpayer bailout rather than true forgiveness, shifting the financial burden instead of eliminating it.The bailouts are ironic as Biden's history as the author of the bill that prevented students from declaring bankruptcy on student loans in the first place, yet now he is proposing debt relief.The plan is politically motivated, aiming to secure the young voter demographic, despite lacking a strategy to reform the underlying issues of the student loan system.Concerns are raised about the fairness of the bailout, highlighting that it benefits high earners like doctors and lawyers, while burdening middle-income workers like police officers and teachers.The student loan forgiveness plan does not address future students or change how the student loan program operates, potentially setting expectations for future bailouts.Political protests funded by major Democrat donors are a part of a broader strategy to influence young voters and promote progressive agendas on college campuses.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Lying has become the great sport in American politics
May 17 2024
Lying has become the great sport in American politics
TOPIC: Political Deception and Truth in American PoliticsWATCH: Visit foramerica.orgMONEY LINE: "Lying has become the great sport in American politics."KEY TAKEAWAYS:Political deception is a significant issue, with leaders like Nancy Pelosi selectively using data to compare the economic records of Donald Trump and Joe Biden, ignoring external factors like COVID-19.The Trump team faces continuous attacks based on distortions or outright falsehoods from the Biden administration, especially on issues like abortion policy.Despite widespread misinformation, the consensus is that the American public is becoming increasingly skeptical of political lies and expects some level of deception from politicians.The discussion shifts to personal integrity and the impact of personal issues on political leadership, comparing situations like Newt Gingrich’s multiple marriages to the qualifications needed for political leadership.The treatment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s candidacy by major news outlets is a sign of his gaining traction, with the media digging up irrelevant personal history to potentially undermine his campaign.There is an acceptable level of political deception, but it requires distinctions between personal transgressions and those that have significant public consequences, like misleading justifications for war.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
How bad is the $1.2 trillion spending package?
Apr 2 2024
How bad is the $1.2 trillion spending package?
TOPIC: Congressional Dynamics and Government ShutdownsMONEY LINE: "I actually think that they would survive. I don't think chaos is a problem, right? And I don't think conflict is a problem. You've got to remember the country votes for conflict."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The recent $1.2 trillion legislative package has sparked controversy as it passed a Republican House with significant support from Democrats while not achieving conservative goals.Government shutdowns, often portrayed as catastrophic, have historically not halted essential services, challenging the narrative that they are universally detrimental.Shutdowns are used as political tools by both parties, but the actual impact on government functionality and public life is typically less dramatic than suggested.The narrative around shutdowns and their political implications is complex, with past shutdowns not necessarily leading to electoral losses for Republicans.The current political strategy and leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson are questionable. His speakership has been so far ineffective and has failed to achieve conservative policy goals.The potential for a government shutdown or leadership vacuum raises concerns about the U.S.'s ability to respond to international challenges and domestic governance.The situation presents an opportunity for Republicans to redefine their strategy and priorities, emphasizing governance and national security amidst internal disagreements and challenges.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Can Texas stop abortion by mail?
Mar 29 2024
Can Texas stop abortion by mail?
TOPIC: Texas sues to stop the FDA's abortion pill by mailMONEY LINE: "You saw an old man yelling at 30 million people on national television and yelling at the Congress."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The Supreme Court's role is to interpret the Constitution, not to legislate from the bench, focusing on whether parties have standing and if actions align with constitutional allowances or prohibitions.The Left has shifted the abortion debate from "safe, legal, and rare" to easily accessible abortion methods without ID verification, prescription, or preventing children's access.The case brings into question the FDA's decision to allow mail distribution of abortion pills, challenging Texas's abortion laws and the federal agency's authority.The Supreme Court has the ability to set the law on the abortion pill case, but legislative actions and funding decisions by Congress could advance the pro-life agenda if Republicans could get their acts together.The political landscape is deeply divided on abortion, with recent electoral outcomes suggesting that abortion rights remain a potent issue for Democrats.The pro-life movement faces challenges in messaging and strategy, with a need for clearer policy proposals to support pregnant women and counter the push for expanded abortion access.The Supreme Court may indicate that the resolution of contentious issues like abortion funding lies with Congress's power of the purse, not judicial intervention.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
How will Biden's mental state affect the 2024 race?
Mar 22 2024
How will Biden's mental state affect the 2024 race?
TOPIC: Biden's competency after the State of the Union and what it means for 2024MONEY LINE: "You saw an old man yelling at 30 million people on national television and yelling at the Congress."KEY TAKEAKWAYS:Observations of Biden's physical and verbal stumbling have intensified doubts about his capacity to serve effectively.Biden's performance at the State of the Union did not yield the usual post-address bump in approval, despite the media narrative he is clearly mentally compromised.Frequent misstatements and gaffes by Biden, such as confusing inflation rates and countries, demonstrate his inability to think and speak effectively.Biden's handling of immigration and his reluctance to use the term "illegal immigrant" when describing Laken Riley's murderer have rightly started haunting his campaign.The relationship between the Biden administration and certain media outlets raises questions about bias and the portrayal of Biden's presidency, as seen with the MSNBC interview he did post-State of the Union.America is divided into two views: one that sees unauthorized border crossings as illegal and a threat, and another that views them as undocumented but not a concern.A significant portion of Democrats express doubts about Biden's mental fitness for another term, a group he needs to convince otherwise if he wants to win back the White House.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Donald-Donalds Could be Happening
Feb 23 2024
Donald-Donalds Could be Happening
TOPIC: Donald Trump's Vice Presidential Pick for the 2024 ElectionMONEY LINE: "The number one rule of the vice president selection is twofold. One, can you step into the job immediately? And two, you don't want to upstage the number one."KEY TAKEAWAYS:Donald Trump is the likely Republican nominee for the 2024 election, with his vice presidential pick being a subject of much speculation.Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley are unlikely choices for Trump's running mate, with DeSantis not adding much to the ticket and Haley not being a favorable choice.Vivek Ramaswamy is seen as a tempting but unlikely choice due to his potential to upstage Trump and lack of electoral college advantage.Tim Scott's previous poor performance in the primaries and his senatorial background make him an unlikely pick for vice president.Byron Donalds could be an excellent choice for his dynamic presence, policy-making experience, and the potential to counteract accusations of racism against Trump.The selection of a female vice presidential candidate, such as Kristi Noem or Elise Stefanik, is not seen as a solution to sexism accusations against Trump.Tulsi Gabbard and Tucker Carlson are considered long shots, with Gabbard lacking platform synergy with Trump and Carlson's lack of governing experience being a risky proposition.The ideal vice presidential pick should be ready to step into the presidency if needed, not upstage Trump, and complement his platform and electoral strategy.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Unpacking Ronna McDaniel's Exit and the Battle for the Party's Soul
Feb 15 2024
Unpacking Ronna McDaniel's Exit and the Battle for the Party's Soul
TOPIC: This episode discusses the departure of Ronna McDaniel from her position as the chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC) and delves into the implications and expectations for the party's future leadership.MONEY LINE: "You have really only one opportunity to control how you define yourself, and that is your website."KEY TAKEAKES:Leadership Transition: Ronna McDaniel is stepping down as RNC chair due to various challenges, including fundraising issues and lack of electoral success, with her tenure ending on February 24.Impact of Leadership on Party Messaging: McDaniel's admission of not controlling the party's message highlighted a significant leadership and strategic gap, especially evident post the Virginia and New Jersey elections in 2023.Donald Trump's Influence: Despite not being the official nominee, Donald Trump's significant influence on the party and its direction is undeniable, with suggestions that his preference played a role in McDaniel's departure.Need for a Stronger RNC Chair: The discussion points to a historical lack of strong RNC leadership without a sitting president, emphasizing the need for a figure with a stronger personality to steer the party effectively.Vivek Ramaswamy's Role: Ramaswamy's public call for McDaniel's resignation and his close association with Trump suggest he may have influenced the leadership change, reflecting the base's sentiment.Organizational Consistency and Messaging: The inconsistency in McDaniel's approach to party messaging and candidate support is critiqued, underscoring the importance of coherent and consistent leadership.Challenges for the New Chair: The incoming chair faces the immediate tasks of enhancing the RNC's digital presence, defining the party's identity more clearly, and preparing for the upcoming convention amidst a tight timeline.Importance of Digital and Messaging Strategy: The discussion concludes with an emphasis on the critical need for the new RNC chair to master digital tools and messaging to navigate the contemporary political landscape effectively.Defining the Party's Identity: Wikipedia does a better job defining who the Republicans are than the Republicans do themselves.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Iran and Its Proxy Attacks: A Discussion About the Correct U.S. Response
Feb 10 2024
Iran and Its Proxy Attacks: A Discussion About the Correct U.S. Response
Topic: This episode delves into the complex historical and contemporary relationship between Iran and the United States, exploring Iran's transformation post-1979 revolution, its regional proxy wars, and the nuanced American responses under different administrations.Money Line: "The killing of the American troops is a Rubicon. You just cannot allow it to be crossed again."Key Takeaways:Historical Context: The 1979 Iranian revolution marked a significant shift, transforming Iran from a beacon of modernity in the Middle East to a state characterized by oppression and violence.Regional Influence: Iran extends its influence through proxy groups like the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas, challenging US interests and allies in the region.US-Iran Tensions: Recent attacks on US interests and personnel have reignited debates on the adequacy of American responses, highlighting differences in approach between administrations.Political Ramifications: The episode questions the Biden administration's public communication strategy regarding military responses to Iranian provocations, suggesting a potential desire to downplay aggressive defense measures.Comparative Leadership Analysis: Reflects on different US presidents' approaches to foreign threats, with a particular focus on their willingness to publicly commit to defending American interests.Diplomacy vs. Military Action: Discusses the balancing act between diplomatic efforts and the necessity of military response, citing Trump's administration as effective in curtailing Iran's antagonism without full military engagement.The Role of Public Opinion and Political Base: Suggests that domestic political considerations, particularly regarding the Democratic base's views on foreign intervention, may influence Biden's public stance on Iran.Future Prospects: Contemplates the conditions under which the US might consider a more forceful military response against Iran, emphasizing the protection of American lives as a paramount concern.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
How much longer can Nikki Haley stay in the 2024 race?
Jan 26 2024
How much longer can Nikki Haley stay in the 2024 race?
TOPIC: Nikki Haley's New Hampshire Primary Loss and Predictions for the 2024 Presidential RaceMONEY LINE: "I don't see Nikki Haley in a second Trump administration."KEY TAKEAWAYS:Donald Trump's victory in New Hampshire, following his win in Iowa, sets a strong precedent, as no candidate has won both states and gone on to lose the nomination.Nikki Haley's performance in New Hampshire, while improved, still places her in second, raising doubts about her campaign's viability.Joe Biden, despite being a write-in candidate, also secures a win in New Hampshire.Nikki Haley's performance in New Hampshire, while showing an upward trend, still places her behind Trump, raising questions about her campaign's future.The viability of Haley's campaign is doubtful due to limited financial resources and her reliance on crossover Democratic votes in New Hampshire which won't be able to carry her in other states.Nikki Haley's poll numbers aren't great, with her trailing by over 30 points in her home state of South Carolina.Ron DeSantis's decision to exit the race shortly after Iowa reflects the challenges candidates face in maintaining momentum and funding.The tendency of candidates to assert their continuation in the race often foreshadows imminent withdrawal, as seen with Vivek Ramaswamy and Ron DeSantis.The future of Nikki Haley in politics, particularly in a potential Trump administration, is uncertain due to her late-standing opposition to Trump.Donald Trump's ability to control media attention and voter engagement continues to outpace any other candidate, including his speculating about his Vice Presidential pick dominating headlines.The Republican Party faces the challenge of diversifying its voter base, particularly appealing to suburban women on issues like abortion.The dominance of Trump in the media and his unconventional political approach make him a formidable candidate, despite potential legal challenges.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Donald Trump is running away with this thing
Jan 19 2024
Donald Trump is running away with this thing
TOPIC: Analysis of the 2024 Iowa Caucus and Predictions for New Hampshire PrimaryMONEY LINE: "Until someone can beat Trump, I'm picking Trump."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The 2024 Iowa Caucus was the least anticipated in recent history and resulted in a predictable victory for Donald Trump.The caucus' timing, coinciding with extreme cold weather and the NFL playoffs, left a lot to be desired.Donald Trump significantly outperformed expectations, securing over 50% of the vote.Ron DeSantis underperformed despite significant campaign spending and time in the state, raising questions about his strategy and messaging.Nikki Haley over-performed, but her claim of a two-person race after finishing third in Iowa is unrealistic.The Iowa GOP's decision to hold the caucus in extreme cold weather and against major events was foolish and does not benefit the GOP.The results of the Iowa Caucus reflected the divisions within the Republican Party, with different factions supporting different candidates, although it seems clear the MAGA-wing is the largest.The future of Ron DeSantis's campaign is uncertain, given his underperformance and lack of momentum.Nikki Haley's potential success in New Hampshire may not significantly impact the overall race, especially if she underperforms in subsequent states, including her home state where she is projected to lose to Donald Trump.The New Hampshire Primary predictions include Trump leading, Haley in high 30s, and DeSantis struggling to reach double digits.Donald Trump remains the frontrunner and is likely to secure the Republican nomination unless significant changes occur.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
Who Can Win the Iowa Caucuses?
Jan 15 2024
Who Can Win the Iowa Caucuses?
TOPIC: The 2024 Iowa Caucuses and the Race to the White HouseMONEY LINE: "I think this nomination process is going to get wrapped up fairly quickly. For all its bluster, for all the ink spilled about it - you're going to see a Trump Biden rematch."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The 2024 Republican presidential primary field has narrowed down to Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, and Vivek Ramaswamy.The significance of Iowa as the first caucus state is questionable, while a more compact and diverse primary schedule could be better for Republican voters.The unique caucus process in Iowa requires intense voter engagement, which may not accurately reflect broader Republican voter sentiment.Vivek Ramaswamy's strength lies in his ability to go viral and engage with new media, but his financial sustainability beyond Iowa and New Hampshire is uncertain.Ron DeSantis needs a strong showing in Iowa to maintain momentum, but even a performance in the 30-39% range may struggle to carry him through to New Hampshire and Nevada.Nikki Haley's strategy focuses on New Hampshire, but she faces challenges in gaining significant support in Iowa.Donald Trump is predicted to perform strongly in Iowa and New Hampshire, with his floor in Iowa estimated at around 41-42%.The influence of Iowa on the overall nomination process is not as powerful as many suggest, there are many past instances where Iowa winners did not secure the nomination.The 2024 Republican nomination is expected to be a two-man race between Trump and DeSantis, with Trump likely to secure the nomination.The possibility of a Trump-Biden rematch in the 2024 general election is anticipated, reflecting the country's desire for a conclusive contest following the 2020 election uncertainties.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
The UN is anti-American, we should stop picking up their tab.
Dec 22 2023
The UN is anti-American, we should stop picking up their tab.
TOPIC: The United States' Role in the United Nations and World Health OrganizationMONEY LINE: "The Republican Party platform has long stated that we ought not be funding these types of activities within the UN. It's time to get serious about adhering to some of these commitments."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The United Nations is leaning too far left and being overly dependent on American funding while simultaneously criticizing U.S. policies.Senator Mike Lee has proposed a bill to withdraw the U.S. from the U.N., a move long discussed among some Republicans.The U.N.'s slow response in condemning Hamas's attacks and its inclusion of China on the Human Rights Commission are reason enough to stop funding the Leftist organization.The U.S. contributes a significant amount of funding to the U.N., raising questions about the alignment of values and the lack of gratitude towards American generosity.The U.N. is using climate change as a tool for wealth redistribution, with no clear plan for the funds.The World Health Organization (WHO) botched the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and protected those responsible for the outbreak.The U.N. and WHO are straying from their original well-intentioned purposes and adopting liberal agendas not aligned with U.S. values.The Republican Party's platform has long advocated for reducing involvement in the U.N., but there's skepticism about the party's commitment to this stance.Mike Lee's bill is a serious attempt to address these issues and align with the Republican base's views.Visit foramerica.org to watch the full interview.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website
The Hypocrisy of the Climate Cult
Dec 19 2023
The Hypocrisy of the Climate Cult
TOPIC: The Climate Change Cult and Its Impact on FreedomMONEY LINE: "The beauty of Donald Trump is that he goes the total opposite. You heard him on the other day with on Fox. Day one. I'm going to drill. And so I can't find any other places to drill. That's exactly the type of response that that a Republican politician needs to have."KEY TAKEAWAYS:The conference is an elitist event, with leaders flying in private jets to discuss environmental issues.The UK Prime Minister spent more time flying to the conference than he did at the conference. Yet another hypocritical elitist flying a private jet while complaining about your car.These climate conferences and the proposed measures are wildly ineffective at best, especially when major polluters like China are not held to the same standards.The push for environmental policies, such as banning gas stoves and reducing meat consumption, infringes on personal freedoms and choices. The elites want to take away your rights in the name of their climate religion.The climate change agenda is being driven more by financial interests and has become a sort of religion for some.Republicans often fear backlash from the media for opposing popular environmental narratives more than they care to do what is right.Donald Trump's direct approach to energy independence is correct. We need to do away with Republicans fearing the media and the climate cultists.Climate change was a low-priority issue for most voters in the 2020 election.Historic climate change agendas have failed, miserably. There is little to suggest that this time around would be any different.Support the Show.Follow ForAmerica on Social:FACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMYOUTUBEOfficial ForAmerica Website