Gay Conservatives of America

Peter Boykin

Gay Conservatives of America
Don't Tread on US
GaysForTrump.org #GoRight read less
NewsNews

Episodes

How to Tell if a Trump Supporter is a Racist
Feb 9 2021
How to Tell if a Trump Supporter is a Racist
How to Tell If a Trump Supporter Is Racisthttps://youtu.be/NcCUfD_y_JsEvery non-liberal leftist — that is, nearly every Democrat running for president, New York Times and Washington Post columnist, CNN and MSNBC host, and your left-wing brother-in-law — labels every Trump supporter and, of course, President Donald Trump, a “racist.”https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/how-to-tell-if-a-trump-supporter-is-a-ra_1And they don’t stop there. Leftists don’t only label the half of the country that supports the president “racist,” they label all whites and America itself “racist.” If your son or daughter attends or recently attended an American university, it is close to certain he or she was repeatedly told that America and all whites are racist. According to the Left, whites are divided between those who admit they are racist and those who don’t admit it.The #Qiew TonightA Part of the #GoRight Network#GoRight News with Peter BoykinWebsite:https://GoRightNews.comhttps://TheQiew.comYouTube:https://youtube.com/peterboykinTelegram:https://t.me/realpeterboykinhttps://t.me/gorightnewshttps://t.me/fuckthelefthttps://t.me/magafirstnewsGab:https://gab.com/peterboykinOdysee:https://odysee.com/@PeterBoykin:2Facebook:https://Facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficialTwitter:https://Twitter.com/GoRightNewsSupport:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/PeterBoykinhttps://www.patreon.com/PeterBoykinhttps://PayPal.me/MagaFirstNewsPodcast:Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin
Just What Does the Constitution Do in the Case of a Tight Election
Nov 13 2020
Just What Does the Constitution Do in the Case of a Tight Election
Just What Does the Constitution Do in the Case of a Tight Election?Since 1789, there have been 58 presidential elections. The Supreme Court was directly involved in settling a dispute in the 2000 contest between George Bush and Al Gore, and five Justices sat on a commission that decided the 1876 race between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden. https://youtu.be/rDiSGBjW_m0Other than that, the Court can get involved in settling disputes about the electoral process, such as about gerrymandering and voting rights, but it is rare for a presidential election to be disputed after Election Day in the nation’s highest court.The 2000 and 1876 elections were disputed over vote counting and the legitimate slates of electors chosen for the Electoral College. In the recent 2000 dispute, Bush led Gore by a narrow margin in the state of Florida when the popular votes were first counted. Gore disputed the vote count and process; ultimately, the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore that using different vote-count standards within Florida violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and that a vote-recount couldn’t be completed by a December 12 deadline. (Ginsburg was on the minority of both parts of the decision.)The 1876 scenario was unique in that the presidential election saw disputed groups of electors submitted by four states. Each of the states, Florida, Oregon, Louisiana, and South Carolina, sent two rival slates of electors to Congress to be counted. Since Congress was deadlocked on party lines, it negotiated a compromise solution: a special commission of 15 people to decide the election. The commission consisted of five Senate members, five House members, and five Supreme Court Justices. In the end, it was the vote of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Bradley that gave the election to the Republicans as part of a compromise to end Reconstruction.An 1887 law changed how Congress can settle such a dispute without invoking a special commission including Supreme Court Justices in the process. The House and Senate would each serve as a referee, with the governor of the state in dispute as a tie-breaker if Congress can’t agree on which slate of rival electors to choose.So how could the 2020 election wind up in front of the Court?Currently, the specter looms of a potential court fight over vote recounts in states where the results are very tight. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 20 states and the District of Columbia have automatic recount provisions that kick in when elections are very close, and 43 states allow losing candidates to ask for a recount. And any dispute in the lower court system can wind up in the Supreme Court.Complicating that disputed-voter scenario is if there was a split on the Supreme Court. The more politically cynical court watcher could conclude that the court would favor a Republican candidate, but in the unpredictable 2020 election, it would be hard to even guess at the Court’s possible voting in that scenario.Even Though Donald Trump has added so many new justices in his short 4 years in office.Today the #Qiew is going to discuss the Constitution and give our take on the matter.#Qiew #GoRighthttps://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/just-what-does-the-constitution-do-in-th
Is America a Democracy or Republic
Nov 13 2020
Is America a Democracy or Republic
Is America a Democracy or a Republic?https://youtu.be/08gnCM31KqYHonestly, this might be more of a Republican (Republic) vs Democrat (Democracy) but it is something that is said over again and again. "A Democracy Dies in Darkness" "We Must Save Our Democracy" but has anyone ever really read the Pledge of Allegiance?The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931). It was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September 8, 1892. Bellamy had hoped that the pledge would be used by citizens in any country.In its original form it read:"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."In 1923, the words, "the Flag of the United States of America" were added. At this time it read:"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we say today. Bellamy's daughter objected to this alteration. Today it reads:"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."Source: https://www.ushistory.org/documents/pledge.htmA little history lesson:It’s true that some Framing-era commentators made arguments that distinguished “democracy” and “republic”; see, for instance, The Federalist (No. 10), though even that first draws the distinction between “pure democracy” and a “republic,” only later just saying “democracy.” But even in that era, “representative democracy” was understood as a form of democracy, alongside “pure democracy”: John Adams used the term “representative democracy” in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker’s Blackstone likewise uses “democracy” to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier “representative” is omitted.Ultimately searching for the answer comes up with this: While often categorized as a democracy, the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic. Yet the discussion is out there and it can be a bit confusing.https://www.spreaker.com/user/9922149/is-america-a-democracy-or-republic