Listen Ad-free

Why the Trump Ballot Case Is the Ultimate Test of Originalism

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

Feb 7 2024 • 27 mins

This week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that has the potential to remove Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado, and possibly across the country. At issue is the Fourteenth Amendment provision that prohibits the leader of an insurrection from holding office, and whether the clause can be applied to Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. The New Yorker staff writer Jill Lepore, along with other notable historians, wrote an amicus brief that contextualizes the law. “This court has made momentous decisions in the last few years, certainly in the last two decades, in the name of an originalist interpretation of the Constitution,” she tells Tyler Foggatt. “And the only originalist interpretation of the Constitution available to them in this case is that Donald Trump cannot run for President of the United States.”

You Might Like

The Daily
The Daily
The New York Times
The Dan Bongino Show
The Dan Bongino Show
Cumulus Podcast Network | Dan Bongino
WSJ What’s News
WSJ What’s News
The Wall Street Journal
Pod Save America
Pod Save America
Crooked Media
The Rachel Maddow Show
The Rachel Maddow Show
Rachel Maddow, MSNBC
Serial
Serial
Serial Productions & The New York Times
Morning Joe
Morning Joe
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, MSNBC
Mark Levin Podcast
Mark Levin Podcast
Cumulus Podcast Network
The Glenn Beck Program
The Glenn Beck Program
Blaze Podcast Network
The Ben Shapiro Show
The Ben Shapiro Show
The Daily Wire
WSJ Your Money Briefing
WSJ Your Money Briefing
The Wall Street Journal
Morning Wire
Morning Wire
The Daily Wire
The Fox News Rundown
The Fox News Rundown
FOX News Radio
Start Here
Start Here
ABC News
The Matt Walsh Show
The Matt Walsh Show
The Daily Wire